Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 34 — part 2

Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness

Vote
Paragraph 34 — part 2
Result
566 for · 60 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 July 2025, 13:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 22 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 34/2
Vote id
178131
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 566 for, 60 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 87 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “underlines that the sector is characterised by high levels of risk and that reducing the cost of investment failure in the EU is necessary for attracting large-scale capital investment; calls for dedicated support to ensure that biotechnology and biomanufacturing SMEs, start-ups and scale-ups can access sufficient funding and compete globally; stresses that cross-border investment barriers must be reduced to facilitate investment in biotechnology and biomanufacturing scale-ups;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 25Abst. 1No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 4No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 117Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 173Against 2Abst. 0No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 64Against 2Abst. 6No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 73Against 6Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 2Against 18Abst. 5No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 7No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark001
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland010
France400
Greece002
Croatia100
Italy1910
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland1900
Romania600
Sweden003

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 34 — part 2 — Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness”. Vote, 10 July 2025. votingId 178131, reference 2025/2008(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178131 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-10-178131,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 34 — part 2 — Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178131}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178131},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178131, reference 2025/2008(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}