Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 49 — part 1

Security of energy supply in the EU

Vote
Paragraph 49 — part 1
Result
529 for · 106 against · 32 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 July 2025, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 49/1
Vote id
177874
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 529 for, 106 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Highlights that energy efficiency plays a critical role in enhancing the security of energy supply by reducing overall energy demand, lowering dependency on energy imports and increasing system resilience; considers that the new security of supply framework should be broadened to reflect a new way of looking at the security of energy supply, based not only on energy sources, but also on the energy efficiency first principle, energy savings, cost efficiency, as well as the ability to produce different types of energy domestically;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 68Against 5Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 167Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 65Against 4Abst. 6No vote 4 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 3Abst. 22No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 11Against 13Abst. 4No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium003
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark010
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland001
France400
Greece002
Croatia100
Italy2100
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland2000
Romania600
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 610 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.86 615 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.84 619 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 5 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote447 for, 74 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 498 voters
8 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Final561 for, 109 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.83 666 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 606 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.82 605 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 631 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal538 for, 96 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.82 617 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorFinal548 for, 74 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.81 619 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 49 — part 1 — Security of energy supply in the EU”. Vote, 8 July 2025. votingId 177874, reference 2025/2055(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177874 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-08-177874,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 49 — part 1 — Security of energy supply in the EU}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177874}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177874},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177874, reference 2025/2055(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}