Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8 to paragraph 15

Security of energy supply in the EU

Vote
Amendment 8 to paragraph 15
Result
200 for · 424 against · 42 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2025, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, Members
Official label
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 15 – Am 8
Vote id
177871
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 200 for, 424 against, 42 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 122Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 72Abst. 0No vote 3 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 28Against 132Abst. 6No vote 22 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ECRFor 55Against 0Abst. 22No vote 2 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
PatriotsFor 70Against 0Abst. 11No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium003
Bulgaria001
Cyprus001
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia001
Italy2200
Lithuania002
Latvia201
Netherlands001
Poland1109
Romania303
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 567 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment205 for, 350 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.93 536 voters
8 May 2025Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment200 for, 351 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 534 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment199 for, 354 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 531 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment209 for, 339 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by S&D, ECR, The Leftr · shared0.92 525 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 554 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.92 612 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 5 to recital 2 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment202 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 532 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 6 to recital 3 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment206 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 534 voters
23 Oct 2025Final vote on motion B10-0457/2025 Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuelsFinal180 for, 373 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.91 538 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 — Security of energy supply in the EU”. Vote, 8 July 2025. votingId 177871, reference 2025/2055(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177871 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-08-177871,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 — Security of energy supply in the EU}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177871}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177871},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177871, reference 2025/2055(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}