Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 7 — part 3

Security of energy supply in the EU

Vote
Paragraph 7 — part 3
Result
481 for · 115 against · 71 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 July 2025, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 7/3
Vote id
177865
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 481 for, 115 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘non-fossil’ and ‘in a transition period; draws attention to the important role that the optimal use of high-efficiency cogeneration, in line with the Energy Efficiency Directive, can play in contributing to balancing the electricity grid and to the competitiveness of some industrial sectors, especially those that do not have alternative ways of producing affordable heat in their industrial processes; stresses the need to modernise and expand district heating grids to this end;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 0Abst. 36No vote 5 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.82
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 64Against 9Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 165Against 2Abst. 0No vote 21 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 61Against 5Abst. 10No vote 3 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 6Against 64Abst. 11No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 8No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2800
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland310
France510
Greece600
Croatia600
Ireland400
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2000
Portugal600
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaFinal456 for, 118 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.86 597 voters
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal478 for, 116 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.85 598 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 610 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 88 The European Water Resilience StrategySeparate vote460 for, 165 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 600 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal495 for, 130 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 656 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 621 voters
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on MoldovaFinal505 for, 115 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.84 610 voters
10 Sept 2025Paragraph 12 — part 1 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceSplit vote520 for, 102 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 615 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 617 voters
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on MontenegroFinal486 for, 101 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.83 609 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 7 — part 3 — Security of energy supply in the EU”. Vote, 8 July 2025. votingId 177865, reference 2025/2055(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177865 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-08-177865,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 7 — part 3 — Security of energy supply in the EU}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177865}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177865},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177865, reference 2025/2055(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}