Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 7 — part 1

Security of energy supply in the EU

Vote
Paragraph 7 — part 1
Result
572 for · 19 against · 79 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 July 2025, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 7/1
Vote id
177863
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 572 for, 19 against, 79 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 85 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘non-fossil’, ‘and biomass’ and ‘in a transition period; draws attention to the important role that the optimal use of high-efficiency cogeneration, in line with the Energy Efficiency Directive, can play in contributing to balancing the electricity grid and to the competitiveness of some industrial sectors, especially those that do not have alternative ways of producing affordable heat in their industrial processes; stresses the need to modernise and expand district heating grids to this end;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 9Abst. 30No vote 5 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.60
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 167Against 0Abst. 1No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 53Against 6Abst. 21No vote 5 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ESNFor 4Against 2Abst. 20No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 22Against 2Abst. 5No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Cyprus001
Germany013
Denmark010
Spain003
Finland101
France108
Greece004
Ireland003
Italy071
Portugal002
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 670 members

No vote recorded, 49

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 49 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 7 — part 1 — Security of energy supply in the EU”. Vote, 8 July 2025. votingId 177863, reference 2025/2055(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177863 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-08-177863,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 7 — part 1 — Security of energy supply in the EU}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177863}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-08/177863},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177863, reference 2025/2055(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}