Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 6 — part 2

Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran

Vote
Paragraph 6 — part 2
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
411 for · 51 against · 26 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0284/2025/REV1 – § 6/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0286
Dossier
2025/2753(RSP)
Vote id
177599
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 411 for, 51 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 84 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘and the EU’s full support and increase support for civil society organisations;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 96Against 0Abst. 0No vote 40 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 50Against 1Abst. 0No vote 24 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 117Against 5Abst. 1No vote 65 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 46Against 4Abst. 0No vote 29 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 28Against 14Abst. 14No vote 29 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 2No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 6Against 8Abst. 9No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Germany223
France001
Greece022
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania101
Slovakia041

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 488 members

No vote recorded, 231

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 231 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote478 for, 68 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.80 418 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Addressing transnational repression of human rights defendersFinal512 for, 76 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.80 441 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineSplit vote460 for, 80 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 401 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 23 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote545 for, 70 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 86 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.77 429 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 7 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote484 for, 74 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 432 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceFinal490 for, 65 against, 86 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.73 450 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.72 413 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 399 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 4 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote428 for, 76 against, 103 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 431 voters
27 Nov 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Draft amending budget No 5/2024: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesFinal525 for, 75 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.71 465 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177599
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 6 — part 2 — Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177599, reference 2025/2753(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177599 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177599,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 6 — part 2 — Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177599}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177599},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177599, reference 2025/2753(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}