Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10, after paragraph 5

Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran

Vote
Amendment 10, after paragraph 5
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
168 for · 312 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0284/2025/REV1 – After § 5 – Am 10
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0286
Dossier
2025/2753(RSP)
Vote id
177600
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 312 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 22Abst. 4No vote 17 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
GreensFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 15 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 94Abst. 1No vote 41 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 2Against 51Abst. 0No vote 22 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 23Against 104Abst. 3No vote 58 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 53Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 57Against 0Abst. 1No vote 27 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ESNFor 17Against 0Abst. 5No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 4No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium001
Germany110
Denmark100
Spain030
Finland100
France070
Ireland012
Italy080
Portugal020
Sweden001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 498 members

No vote recorded, 221

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 221 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 421 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 421 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 423 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 421 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 99, adding text after recital 4 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment219 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 462 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 417 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 425 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment178 for, 379 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 421 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 52 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment209 for, 287 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 365 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 420 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177600
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 10, after paragraph 5 — Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177600, reference 2025/2753(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177600 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177600,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10, after paragraph 5 — Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177600}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177600},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177600, reference 2025/2753(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}