Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24 — part 2

Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability

Vote
Amendment 24 — part 2
Result
419 for · 97 against · 54 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 78 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
A10-0104/2025 – Veronika Vrecionová – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 24/2
Vote id
177459
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 419 for, 97 against, 54 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “In exceptional cases, such as when a hunting or livestock guardian dog is severely injured in a remote location where veterinary help is not accessible, other methods may be used, provided they minimise suffering to the greatest extent possible.”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 27Abst. 4No vote 13 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
GreensFor 2Against 48Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 109Against 2Abst. 0No vote 25 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 45Against 11Abst. 0No vote 19 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 131Against 4Abst. 4No vote 49 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 60Against 2Abst. 2No vote 15 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 35Against 0Abst. 34No vote 16 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 3Abst. 9No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia002
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Italy2000
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland1600
Romania400
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 570 members

No vote recorded, 149

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 149 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.80 460 voters
8 May 2025Paragraph 30 — part 2 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketSplit vote375 for, 92 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 401 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.76 358 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.76 533 voters
17 Dec 2024Final vote Forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ categoryFinal499 for, 131 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.75 526 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 1 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote512 for, 89 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 511 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.74 517 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.73 487 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 60 + 91 + 132 (voted as one) to Annex II; Annex III – introductory part Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment565 for, 92 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.73 530 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 23 — part 1 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote509 for, 113 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 505 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 24 — part 2 — Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177459, reference 2023/0447(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177459 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177459,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24 — part 2 — Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177459}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177459},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177459, reference 2023/0447(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}