Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 31, after recital D

Clean Industrial Deal

Vote
Amendment 31, after recital D
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
183 for · 380 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 53 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0277/2025 – After recital D – Am 31
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0278
Dossier
2025/2656(RSP)
Vote id
177453
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 183 for, 380 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 58Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 9Against 125Abst. 0No vote 54 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 61Against 0Abst. 1No vote 17 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 71Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 4No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

No vote recorded, 150

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 150 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 21 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment205 for, 427 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.98 516 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 17 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment191 for, 387 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 484 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment203 for, 422 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 493 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 22 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment209 for, 433 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 514 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 517 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 537 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 508 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment188 for, 460 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 530 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 518 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177453
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 31, after recital D — Clean Industrial Deal”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177453, reference 2025/2656(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177453 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177453,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 31, after recital D — Clean Industrial Deal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177453}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177453},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177453, reference 2025/2656(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}