Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 42 to paragraph 9

Clean Industrial Deal

Vote
Amendment 42 to paragraph 9
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
175 for · 387 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0277/2025 – § 9 – Am 42
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0278
Dossier
2025/2656(RSP)
Vote id
177433
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 175 for, 387 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 59Abst. 0No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 12Against 126Abst. 0No vote 50 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 60Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 57Against 5Abst. 9No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 21Against 3Abst. 0No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 571 members

No vote recorded, 148

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 148 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital B Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment200 for, 382 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 486 voters
21 May 2025Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther132 for, 334 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.94 394 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAmendment193 for, 431 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 514 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 480 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 500 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 48 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment188 for, 473 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 544 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 481 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.94 534 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 549 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 484 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177433
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 42 to paragraph 9 — Clean Industrial Deal”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177433, reference 2025/2656(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177433 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177433,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 42 to paragraph 9 — Clean Industrial Deal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177433}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177433},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177433, reference 2025/2656(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}