Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 30 to paragraph 8

Clean Industrial Deal

Vote
Amendment 30 to paragraph 8
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
166 for · 391 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members, S&D
Official label
B10-0277/2025 – § 8 – Am 30
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0278
Dossier
2025/2656(RSP)
Vote id
177428
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 166 for, 391 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 58Abst. 1No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 16Against 124Abst. 1No vote 47 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 60Against 0Abst. 1No vote 18 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 56Against 6Abst. 10No vote 13 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 9Against 10Abst. 4No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Italy1800
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland1500
Romania301
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 574 members

No vote recorded, 145

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 145 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 479 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 499 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 499 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 486 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 515 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 476 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 467 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 507 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 483 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177428
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — Clean Industrial Deal”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177428, reference 2025/2656(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177428 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177428,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — Clean Industrial Deal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177428}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177428},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177428, reference 2025/2656(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}