Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 1

Clean Industrial Deal

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 1
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
381 for · 151 against · 44 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
B10-0277/2025 – § 5/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0278
Dossier
2025/2656(RSP)
Vote id
177421
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 381 for, 151 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Highlights the need to finalise work on the revision of the Energy Taxation Directive , which aims to align the taxation of energy products with the EU’s energy and climate policy objectives, and to harmonise a design of tariff methodologies for network charges, provided that such measures do not come at the expense of final consumers;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 15Against 0Abst. 19No vote 12 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 1Abst. 2No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 135Against 2Abst. 3No vote 48 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 0Against 49Abst. 13No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 1No vote 14 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 12Against 7Abst. 4No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0130
France010
Hungary010
Poland030
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 576 members

No vote recorded, 143

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 143 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 497 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 531 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 567 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 500 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 525 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 511 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 526 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 177, point vii — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionSplit vote446 for, 193 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 527 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 163 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renew, Greensr · shared0.92 570 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177421
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 5 — part 1 — Clean Industrial Deal”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177421, reference 2025/2656(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177421 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177421,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 1 — Clean Industrial Deal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177421}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177421},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177421, reference 2025/2656(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}