Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 32 to paragraph 1

Clean Industrial Deal

Vote
Amendment 32 to paragraph 1
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
168 for · 389 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots
Official label
B10-0277/2025 – § 1 – Am 32
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0278
Dossier
2025/2656(RSP)
Vote id
177412
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 389 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 58Abst. 0No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 7Against 130Abst. 1No vote 50 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 57Against 0Abst. 5No vote 17 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 70Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 24Against 1Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 9Against 6Abst. 8No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria210
Czechia100
Germany1400
France100
Hungary100
Poland300
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 571 members

No vote recorded, 148

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 148 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 516 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 556 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 18 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment184 for, 390 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 485 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 500 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 522 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 468 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 544 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 496 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 499 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 524 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 514 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177412
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 32 to paragraph 1 — Clean Industrial Deal”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177412, reference 2025/2656(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177412 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177412,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 32 to paragraph 1 — Clean Industrial Deal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177412}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177412},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177412, reference 2025/2656(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}