Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 85 — part 3

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Vote
Paragraph 85 — part 3
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2025
Result
424 for · 191 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 37 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 85/3
Text
Report A-10-2025-0100
Dossier
2024/2078(INI)
Vote id
177214
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls for coordinated EU action to counter this threat, including through education, social inclusion programmes and, where necessary, legal measures;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 22Against 0Abst. 19No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 164Against 2Abst. 0No vote 22 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 5No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 19Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain060
France0270
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.96 572 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.96 530 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 522 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 522 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote456 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 599 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 169 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 554 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 580 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 550 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.95 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177214
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 85 — part 3 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177214, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177214 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177214,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 85 — part 3 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177214}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177214},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177214, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}