Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 79

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Vote: Amendment 16 to paragraph 79
Decision: No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2025
Result: 191 for · 453 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 18 June 2025, 13:22

More facts (6)

Position: vote 34 of 50 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D, Members
Official label: A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 79 – Am 16
Text: Report A-10-2025-0100
Dossier: 2024/2078(INI)
Vote id: 177210

Position: vote 34 of 50 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D, Members
Official label: A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 79 – Am 16
Text: Report A-10-2025-0100
Dossier: 2024/2078(INI)
Vote id: 177210

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 42	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 52	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 1	Against 122	Abst. 0	No vote 13 of 136	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 0	Against 64	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 75	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 3	Against 164	Abst. 1	No vote 20 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
ECR	For 66	Against 5	Abst. 3	No vote 5 of 79	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.84
Patriots	For 76	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 27	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 18	Against 4	Abst. 4	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–0–3	6–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–4–0	0–15–0	0–12–0	0–5–0	0–29–0	no member voted	no member voted	15–0–0	6–1–1
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–4–0	1–17–0	0–1–0	0–20–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–9–0	0–5–0	0–10–0	0–12–0	0–6–0	4–0–0	26–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–1
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	10–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–9–0	0–4–0	0–19–0	no member voted	0–6–0	23–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–6–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	17–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–9–0	0–3–0	1–8–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	2–1–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	0	2	0
Belgium	0	2	0
Czechia	0	1	0
Germany	0	15	0
Denmark	0	3	0
Spain	0	4	0
Finland	0	1	0
France	0	5	0
Croatia	0	1	0
Italy	0	4	0
Lithuania	0	1	0
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Latvia	0	1	0
Netherlands	0	6	0
Romania	0	1	0
Sweden	0	3	0
Slovenia	0	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Adrian-George AXINIA group that day: ECR · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
André ROUGÉ group that day: Patriots · France
Andreas GLÜCK group that day: Renew · Germany
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT group that day: Patriots · France
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Beata SZYDŁO group that day: ECR · Poland
Brando BENIFEI group that day: S&D · Italy
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ group that day: EPP · Spain
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Delara BURKHARDT group that day: S&D · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Dóra DÁVID group that day: EPP · Hungary
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Eszter LAKOS group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gilles BOYER group that day: Renew · France
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hana JALLOUL MURO group that day: S&D · Spain
Hannes HEIDE group that day: S&D · Austria
Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER group that day: Renew · Austria
Jaroslav BŽOCH group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaroslava POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jean-Marc GERMAIN group that day: S&D · France
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Kinga KOLLÁR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Letizia MORATTI group that day: EPP · Italy
Loránt VINCZE group that day: EPP · Romania
Ľudovít ÓDOR group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Lukas MANDL group that day: EPP · Austria
Lynn BOYLAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Marcos ROS SEMPERE group that day: S&D · Spain
Maria OHISALO group that day: Greens · Finland
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN group that day: Renew · Germany
Martine KEMP group that day: EPP · Luxembourg
Michalis HADJIPANTELA group that day: EPP · Cyprus
Milan ZVER group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Monika HOHLMEIER group that day: EPP · Germany
Nikolas FARANTOURIS group that day: The Left · Greece
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Philippe OLIVIER group that day: Patriots · France
Pina PICIERNO group that day: S&D · Italy
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Salvatore DE MEO group that day: EPP · Italy
Sibylle BERG group that day: No group · Germany
Sigrid FRIIS group that day: Renew · Denmark
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Sven SIMON group that day: EPP · Germany
Svenja HAHN group that day: Renew · Germany
Ton DIEPEVEEN group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Udo BULLMANN group that day: S&D · Germany
Valentina PALMISANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	191 for, 463 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 605 voters
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	193 for, 464 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 610 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 77 to paragraph 100, after point viii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds	Amendment	196 for, 445 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 598 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	193 for, 472 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 618 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 76 to paragraph 73, after point iii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds	Amendment	190 for, 449 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 599 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 90 to paragraph 252, after point xv Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds	Amendment	191 for, 447 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 600 voters
23 Oct 2024	Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections	Amendment	180 for, 452 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Patriots, EPP	r · shared0.96 585 voters
11 Mar 2025	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme	Amendment	190 for, 469 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Members	r · shared0.96 616 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world	Amendment	179 for, 439 against, 17 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Members, Patriots	r · shared0.96 587 voters
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	186 for, 484 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 621 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Resolution · report by Ana Catarina Mendes 18 Jun 2025 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Amendment 2 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Paragraph 30 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Paragraph 36 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Paragraph 47 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Paragraph 47 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025
Vote The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report — Paragraph 47 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 18 Jun 2025 18 Jun 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177210
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 79 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177210, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177210 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177210,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 79 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177210}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177210},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177210, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}