Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 14, after paragraph 70

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 14, after paragraph 70
Result
185 for · 447 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Members
Official label
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 70 – Am 14
Vote id
177207
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 185 for, 447 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 119Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 157Abst. 4No vote 23 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 61Against 8Abst. 5No vote 5 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 4Abst. 9No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Poland300
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 463 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 604 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 42 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment181 for, 477 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 619 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment193 for, 464 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment193 for, 472 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 617 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 77 to paragraph 100, after point viii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment196 for, 445 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 597 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment178 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 537 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 542 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 618 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment184 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 646 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment178 for, 450 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.97 583 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 14, after paragraph 70 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177207, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177207 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177207,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 14, after paragraph 70 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177207}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177207},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177207, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}