Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2025
Result
174 for · 446 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR, S&D
Official label
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0100
Dossier
2024/2078(INI)
Vote id
177170
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 174 for, 446 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 121Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 163Abst. 0No vote 21 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 58Against 0Abst. 13No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 5Abst. 13No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Cyprus001
Czechia002
Germany017
France001
Greece130
Luxembourg001
Poland001
Romania200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 613 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.97 413 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 468 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 615 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment191 for, 443 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 587 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 582 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment193 for, 472 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 612 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 537 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 395 to recital 19 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment187 for, 442 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 589 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment193 for, 464 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 605 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 18 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment184 for, 390 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177170
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 2 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177170, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177170 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177170,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177170}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177170},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177170, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}