Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 66 — part 2

Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville

Vote
Paragraph 66 — part 2
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2025
Result
327 for · 250 against · 81 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2025, 13:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 66/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0101
Dossier
2025/2004(INI)
Vote id
177050
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 327 for, 250 against, 81 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 2Abst. 1No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 55Against 6Abst. 2No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
EPPFor 36Against 100Abst. 39No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 2No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 46Abst. 28No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0130
France010
Hungary100
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesSplit vote325 for, 290 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.86 592 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 591 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 25 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote361 for, 218 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 591 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment312 for, 321 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.82 597 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.82 637 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 28 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote308 for, 332 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 46 %r · shared0.82 620 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment284 for, 281 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 533 voters
28 Apr 2026Recital AC — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote325 for, 269 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 592 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote294 for, 282 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 533 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote301 for, 298 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 562 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177050
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 66 — part 2 — Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville”. Vote, 17 June 2025. votingId 177050, reference 2025/2004(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177050 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-17-177050,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 66 — part 2 — Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177050}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177050},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177050, reference 2025/2004(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}