Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 55

Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 55
Result
289 for · 347 against · 25 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2025, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 55
Vote id
177046
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 289 for, 347 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 39Against 18Abst. 5No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
EPPFor 12Against 165Abst. 1No vote 10 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 4Against 67Abst. 3No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 0Against 68Abst. 6No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria006
Belgium030
Czechia080
Denmark010
Spain040
France0260
Greece010
Hungary080
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 533 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote245 for, 332 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 534 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.92 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 3 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSeparate vote253 for, 321 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.92 533 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 532 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 528 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 533 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 581 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote311 for, 367 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 629 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 11 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote254 for, 315 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.90 528 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 55 — Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville”. Vote, 17 June 2025. votingId 177046, reference 2025/2004(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177046 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-17-177046,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 55 — Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177046}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/177046},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177046, reference 2025/2004(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}