Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after recital 11

Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production

Vote
Amendment 4, after recital 11
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 22 May 2025
Result
181 for · 396 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 May 2025, 12:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 5 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2025-0043
Dossier
2024/0027(COD)
Vote id
176876
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 396 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 10Against 25Abst. 1No vote 17 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
S&DFor 0Against 107Abst. 0No vote 29 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 5Against 146Abst. 1No vote 36 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 56Against 14Abst. 0No vote 10 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 2No vote 6 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany510
Spain100
France001
Greece021
Poland100
Romania110
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 581 members

No vote recorded, 138

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 138 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.90 353 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAmendment164 for, 461 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 518 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment197 for, 447 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment186 for, 447 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 528 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment186 for, 447 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 526 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.89 533 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 527 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.89 373 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment187 for, 440 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 523 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment173 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 477 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176876
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 4, after recital 11 — Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production”. Vote, 22 May 2025. votingId 176876, reference 2024/0027(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176876 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-22-176876,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after recital 11 — Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176876}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176876},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176876, reference 2024/0027(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}