Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to paragraph 1

Violations of religious freedom in Tibet

Vote
Amendment 1 to paragraph 1
Result
154 for · 379 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:08
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 8 on the decision
Official label
RC-B10-0248/2025 - § 1 - Am 1
Vote id
176341
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 154 for, 379 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 21 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 61Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 11Against 131Abst. 0No vote 46 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 58Against 0Abst. 6No vote 21 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 18Against 0Abst. 3No vote 6 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 1Against 8Abst. 9No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium010
Germany0140
Denmark020
Spain021
Finland020
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 552 members

No vote recorded, 167

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 167 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment171 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 472 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment173 for, 461 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 518 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 23 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment185 for, 475 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 520 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)Other130 for, 316 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.94 351 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 457 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 527 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment189 for, 471 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.94 524 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency lawProcedural164 for, 447 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.93 472 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 498 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 484 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 440 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — Violations of religious freedom in Tibet”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176341, reference 2025/2692(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176341 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176341,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — Violations of religious freedom in Tibet}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176341}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176341},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176341, reference 2025/2692(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}