Skip to content

Decision

Violations of religious freedom in Tibet

Effect
Adopted
Result
478 for · 30 against · 41 abstained roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:08–13:09
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
8 votes · 2 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
Renew (1 roll call)
Final vote
176343
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 478 for, 30 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by The Left; ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 12Abst. 3No vote 23 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 100Against 8Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 141Against 1Abst. 0No vote 46 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 61Against 0Abst. 5No vote 14 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 51Against 0Abst. 12No vote 22 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
ESNFor 3Against 0Abst. 17No vote 7 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 6Against 9Abst. 3No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 30

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria110540.53
Belgium122080.79
Bulgaria80360.59
Cyprus3003—
Czechia141420.61
Germany56812200.61
Denmark120120.88
Estonia6001—
Spain4123140.84
Finland100051.00
France5413230.90
Greece523110.25
Croatia9003—
Hungary60015—
Ireland130011.00
Italy5651140.85
Lithuania7004—
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia7002—
Malta5001—
Netherlands260320.84
Poland450081.00
Portugal152040.82
Romania197250.52
Sweden210001.00
Slovenia6003—
Slovakia6018—

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 549 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches28 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Hermann TERTSCH SpainPatriotsSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches37 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches27 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michael MCNAMARA IrelandRenewSpeeches27 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 6 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESNSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Engin EROGLU GermanyRenewSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Hannes HEIDE AustriaS&DSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ville NIINISTÖ FinlandGreensSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPPSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECRSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 8

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 RC-B10-0248/2025 - § 1 - Am 1 Roll call154 for, 379 against, 19 abstained Rejected
2Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0248/2025 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call478 for, 30 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0248/2025 Show of hands Lapsed
Show the other 7 votesShow the other 5 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0248/2025 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call478 for, 30 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0248/2025 Show of hands Lapsed
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0251/2025 Show of hands Lapsed
5Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0253/2025 Show of hands Lapsed
6Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0254/2025 Show of hands Lapsed
7Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0256/2025 Show of hands Lapsed
8Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0259/2025 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll call requested by Renew.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2025-0259

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on violations of religious freedom in Tibet, expressing concern over the death of Tibetan Buddhist leader Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche and the abduction of the 11th Panchen Lama.

The resolution condemns Chinese policies in Tibet, including restrictions on religious expression and forced assimilation, and calls for targeted EU sanctions against Chinese officials.

It also urges respect for Tibetan cultural and religious freedoms and supports the Tibetan community's right to appoint its own religious leaders.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution expresses concern over violations of religious freedom in Tibet, including the death of Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche, the abduction of the 11th Panchen Lama, and the detention of monks. It calls for investigations, sanctions, and support for Tibetan religious freedom.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2692(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 8 May 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 8 May 2025 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 12 connections: Running issue: Religious freedom · Running issue: China human rights

Running issue: Religious freedom

Running issue: China human rights

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Violations of religious freedom in Tibet”. Decision, 8 May 2025. votingId 176343, document B-10-2025-0259, reference 2025/2692(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-08/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-08-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Violations of religious freedom in Tibet}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-08/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-08/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 176343, document B-10-2025-0259, reference 2025/2692(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}