Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 35, after paragraph 250

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds

Vote
Amendment 35, after paragraph 250
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
132 for · 477 against · 44 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 116 of 120 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0074/2025 – Niclas Herbst – After § 250 – Am 35
Text
Report A-10-2025-0074
Dossier
2024/2019(DEC)
Vote id
175854
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 132 for, 477 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 20 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 35Abst. 2No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 165Abst. 0No vote 22 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 44Against 10Abst. 21No vote 5 of 80Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 52Against 21Abst. 10No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 1Abst. 11No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium040
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0120
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland010
France0130
Greece030
Croatia030
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0200
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal060
Romania1100
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for CourtsAmendment142 for, 380 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 509 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 126 to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment173 for, 477 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 602 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment173 for, 461 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 606 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 128 to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment174 for, 471 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 601 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment178 for, 473 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 619 voters
13 Mar 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Unlawful detention and sham trials of Armenian hostages, including high-ranking political representatives from Nagorno-Karabakh, by AzerbaijanAmendment165 for, 439 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 560 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.86 400 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.86 395 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 53 to paragraph 99 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment167 for, 470 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.85 602 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 102, adding text after paragraph 53 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment178 for, 463 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 598 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175854
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 35, after paragraph 250 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175854, reference 2024/2019(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175854 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175854,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 35, after paragraph 250 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175854}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175854},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175854, reference 2024/2019(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}