Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 to paragraph 98

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds

Vote
Amendment 22 to paragraph 98
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
198 for · 453 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 64 of 120 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0074/2025 – Niclas Herbst – § 98 – Am 22
Text
Report A-10-2025-0074
Dossier
2024/2019(DEC)
Vote id
175811
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 198 for, 453 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 128Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 64Abst. 1No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 15Against 159Abst. 1No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 80Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 3Against 12Abst. 10No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy2300
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia300
Netherlands100
Poland1900
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 34 to paragraph 108 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 448 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 651 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.96 644 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 571 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment195 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 652 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment189 for, 471 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.95 628 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 33 to paragraph 85 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 426 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 636 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 573 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 466 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 624 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment171 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 546 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 32 to paragraph 81 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment201 for, 452 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 652 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175811
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 22 to paragraph 98 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175811, reference 2024/2019(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175811 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175811,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 to paragraph 98 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175811}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175811},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175811, reference 2024/2019(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}