Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 10

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 10
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
188 for · 423 against · 49 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 120 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0074/2025 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2025-0074
Dossier
2024/2019(DEC)
Vote id
175772
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 423 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 14Against 0Abst. 35No vote 4 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.57
S&DFor 112Against 4Abst. 6No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 1Against 68Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 174Abst. 1No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 72Abst. 3No vote 5 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 2Against 80Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 2No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 18Against 6Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia090
Denmark010
Spain050
France0290
Greece010
Hungary280
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 597 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 598 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 436 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 433 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 598 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 595 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 600 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 551 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment195 for, 353 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 509 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 628 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175772
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 10 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175772, reference 2024/2019(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175772 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175772,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 10 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175772}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175772},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175772, reference 2024/2019(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}