Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 5 May 2025
Result
319 for · 37 against · 79 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
5 May 2025, 18:43
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok
Vote id
175671
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 319 for, 37 against, 79 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 21Against 0Abst. 60No vote 55 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.61
RenewFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 105Against 5Abst. 5No vote 73 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 28Against 2Abst. 4No vote 46 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 38Against 13Abst. 7No vote 27 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
ESNFor 1Against 10Abst. 0No vote 15 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 3No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Cyprus200
Czechia212
Germany1720
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain800
Finland100
France200
Greece500
Croatia300
Hungary500
Ireland300
Italy500
Lithuania110
Luxembourg100
Malta200
Netherlands501
Poland1701
Portugal401
Romania300
Sweden200
Slovenia410
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 435 members

No vote recorded, 284

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 284 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-05/175671
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok”. Vote, 5 May 2025. votingId 175671. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-05/175671 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 5 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 5 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-05, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-05/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-05-175671,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-05},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-05/175671}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-05/175671},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175671. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-05 (CC BY 4.0)}
}