Skip to content

Decision

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok

Effect
Adopted
Result
319 for · 37 against · 79 abstained roll call
Date
5 May 2025, 18:43
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
175671
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 319 for, 37 against, 79 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

The agenda was changed.

Backed by The Left, Greens, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by ESN; S&D mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 21Against 0Abst. 60No vote 55 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.61
RenewFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 105Against 5Abst. 5No vote 73 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 28Against 2Abst. 4No vote 46 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 38Against 13Abst. 7No vote 27 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
ESNFor 1Against 10Abst. 0No vote 15 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 3No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Voted against their group, 38

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria120260.79
Belgium110380.68
Bulgaria71270.55
Cyprus3021—
Czechia41790.38
Germany49115310.63
Denmark80340.59
Estonia1006—
Spain14011350.34
Finland40110—
France6003180.93
Greece110460.60
Croatia4017—
Hungary57270.25
Ireland7007—
Italy2508430.64
Lithuania4106—
Luxembourg3003—
Latvia2007—
Malta2013—
Netherlands186340.50
Poland2817170.67
Portugal70590.38
Romania704220.45
Sweden112440.47
Slovenia7110—
Slovakia56040.32

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 435 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok Roll call319 for, 37 against, 79 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok”. Decision, 5 May 2025. votingId 175671. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-05/3 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 5 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 5 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-05, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-05/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-05-3,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-05},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-05/3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-05/3},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 175671. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-05-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-05 (CC BY 4.0)}
}