Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 to recital D

Energy-intensive industries

Vote
Amendment 9 to recital D
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 3 Apr 2025
Result
165 for · 417 against · 32 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
3 April 2025, 13:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 46 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0209/2025 - Considérant D - Am 9
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0209
Dossier
2025/2536(RSP)
Vote id
174692
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 165 for, 417 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 1Against 114Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 8Against 58Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 11Against 148Abst. 0No vote 29 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 42Against 6Abst. 27No vote 11 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 4Abst. 4No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium300
Czechia800
Denmark100
Spain500
France0027
Greece100
Hungary800
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 104

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 104 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment181 for, 386 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.89 515 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 108 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment219 for, 437 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 568 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.88 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.88 521 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 518 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 39 to paragraph 120, after point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 441 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 553 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 31 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment206 for, 428 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 539 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment169 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 522 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 25 to recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment197 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 572 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174692
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 9 to recital D — Energy-intensive industries”. Vote, 3 April 2025. votingId 174692, reference 2025/2536(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174692 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-03/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-03-174692,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 to recital D — Energy-intensive industries}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-03},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174692}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174692},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174692, reference 2025/2536(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03 (CC BY 4.0)}
}