Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 12, after paragraph 6

Energy-intensive industries

Vote
Amendment 12, after paragraph 6
Result
204 for · 370 against · 31 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
3 April 2025, 13:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 32 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0209/2025 - Après le § 6 - Am 12
Vote id
174681
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 204 for, 370 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 29Abst. 3No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 3Against 48Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 19Against 97Abst. 0No vote 20 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
RenewFor 2Against 64Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 44Against 113Abst. 0No vote 31 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
ECRFor 61Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 36Against 10Abst. 25No vote 15 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 20Against 3Abst. 0No vote 3 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria001
Cyprus010
Czechia200
Germany610
Spain100
Greece120
Poland001
Romania200
Slovakia211

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 113

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 113 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment166 for, 367 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.75 508 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment209 for, 339 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by S&D, ECR, The Leftr · shared0.74 494 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment205 for, 350 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.73 497 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 127 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment198 for, 361 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.72 506 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment199 for, 354 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.72 493 voters
23 Oct 2025Final vote on motion B10-0457/2025 Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuelsFinal180 for, 373 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.72 506 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 4 to Title CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment210 for, 355 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.72 503 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 6 to recital 3 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment206 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.72 501 voters
8 May 2025Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment200 for, 351 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, ECRr · shared0.72 497 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 8 to recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment207 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.72 502 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 12, after paragraph 6 — Energy-intensive industries”. Vote, 3 April 2025. votingId 174681, reference 2025/2536(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174681 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-03/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-03-174681,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 12, after paragraph 6 — Energy-intensive industries}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-03},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174681}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174681},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174681, reference 2025/2536(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03 (CC BY 4.0)}
}