Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group

Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Vote
Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 31 Mar 2025
Result
118 for · 326 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
31 March 2025, 18:15
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group
Vote id
174286
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 0No vote 17 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 83Abst. 0No vote 53 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 23 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 113Abst. 0No vote 74 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 36Against 1Abst. 2No vote 41 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 59Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 4Abst. 5No vote 11 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany030
Finland010
France090
Greece030
Italy080
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 451 members

No vote recorded, 267

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 267 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.98 343 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 417 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 47 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment203 for, 456 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 432 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 84 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 431 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 402 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 116, adding text after recital 36 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment185 for, 480 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 420 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment173 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 370 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 74 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment183 for, 451 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.97 411 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.97 351 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 432 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment199 for, 446 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 414 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174286
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Vote, 31 March 2025. votingId 174286. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174286 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-31/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-31-174286,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-31},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174286}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174286},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174286. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31 (CC BY 4.0)}
}