Skip to content

Decision

Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Effect
Rejected
Result
118 for · 326 against · 7 abstained roll call
Date
31 March 2025, 18:15
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
174286
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected by a large majority.

The agenda was left unchanged.

Backed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 0No vote 17 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 83Abst. 0No vote 53 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 23 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 113Abst. 0No vote 74 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 36Against 1Abst. 2No vote 41 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 59Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 4Abst. 5No vote 11 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 4

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria511040.53
Belgium310180.57
Bulgaria2609—
Cyprus1302—
Czechia740100.45
Germany11535260.65
Denmark110040.86
Estonia0007—
Spain1280310.95
Finland0708—
France24370200.41
Greece115050.91
Croatia0507—
Hungary96060.40
Ireland0608—
Italy17250340.39
Lithuania0407—
Luxembourg1401—
Latvia0306—
Malta0105—
Netherlands621130.63
Poland16180190.29
Portugal215040.82
Romania590190.46
Sweden113070.89
Slovenia0801—
Slovakia5406—

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 451 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group Roll call118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Decision, 31 March 2025. votingId 174286. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-03-31/2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-31/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-03-31-2,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-31},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-03-31/2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-03-31/2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 174286. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31 (CC BY 4.0)}
}