Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 76 — part 2 to paragraph 71

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 76 — part 2 to paragraph 71
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
217 for · 422 against · 29 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 148 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 71 – Am 76/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172834
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “reminds the Member States, to this end, of the importance of progressive taxation of capital gains and high incomes as important sources of funding for both the reconstruction of national defence capabilities and comprehensive welfare services;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 0Abst. 12No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 4Abst. 1No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 1Against 70Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 2Against 170Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 3Against 67Abst. 2No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 2Against 81Abst. 0No vote 3 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 2No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 7Against 9Abst. 12No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0120
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia011

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 668 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 599 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 595 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 274 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment198 for, 430 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 194 + 273 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 421 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.92 604 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 441 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 604 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 636 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 554 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 594 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 217 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 594 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172834
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 76 — part 2 to paragraph 71 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172834, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172834 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172834,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 76 — part 2 to paragraph 71 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172834}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172834},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172834, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}