Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 76 — part 1 to paragraph 71

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 76 — part 1 to paragraph 71
Result
267 for · 280 against · 119 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 147 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 71 – Am 76/1
Vote id
172833
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 40 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “reiterates the need to protect welfare services and social investments while investing in defence; recognises the importance of well-funded social welfare services in maintaining overall national resilience;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 30Against 9Abst. 3No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 2Against 69Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 8Against 164Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 0Against 11Abst. 62No vote 7 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 41Against 18Abst. 22No vote 5 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 0Against 4Abst. 19No vote 3 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 11Against 3Abst. 13No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria101
Cyprus100
Czechia002
Germany316
Spain001
Greece022
Poland001
Romania100
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
14 Nov 2024Amendment 5 to recital G EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment252 for, 318 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 593 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 5 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment225 for, 394 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 654 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 575 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital W 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment255 for, 252 against, 132 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 591 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurementAmendment254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 597 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 599 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment376 for, 236 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 657 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment272 for, 290 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 566 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 598 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment202 for, 330 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 517 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 76 — part 1 to paragraph 71 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172833, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172833 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172833,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 76 — part 1 to paragraph 71 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172833}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172833},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172833, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}