Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 69, after paragraph 63

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 69, after paragraph 63
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
52 for · 566 against · 43 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 125 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 63 – Am 69
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172808
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 52 for, 566 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 8 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 23Against 8Abst. 4No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 3Against 41Abst. 6No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
S&DFor 4Against 126Abst. 1No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 1Against 66Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 175Abst. 0No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 0No vote 9 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 1Against 70Abst. 11No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 1Against 6Abst. 16No vote 3 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.54
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 5No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium001
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain004
Finland020
France050
Croatia010
Italy301
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172808
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 69, after paragraph 63 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172808, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172808 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172808,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 69, after paragraph 63 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172808}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172808},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172808, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}