Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 66 — part 2 to paragraph 62

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 66 — part 2 to paragraph 62
Result
227 for · 425 against · 21 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 122 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 62 – Am 66/2
Vote id
172805
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 227 for, 425 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “stresses that the licensed production of US weapons should not be counted as European production, eligible for EU spending;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 8No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
GreensFor 6Against 44Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
S&DFor 119Against 14Abst. 0No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 2Against 66Abst. 2No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 4Against 170Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 3Against 69Abst. 0No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 40Against 39Abst. 2No vote 5 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 3No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 5No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0120
France100
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland011
Slovakia011

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 673 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment214 for, 438 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 636 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4 EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment167 for, 384 against, 78 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 596 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 84, adding text after paragraph 24 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment216 for, 406 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 619 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Amendment 16 to paragraph 92 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment255 for, 314 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 610 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment191 for, 296 against, 143 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 589 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 606 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment240 for, 312 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 528 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 615 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment118 for, 422 against, 88 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 585 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 605 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 66 — part 2 to paragraph 62 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172805, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172805 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172805,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 66 — part 2 to paragraph 62 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172805}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172805},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172805, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}