Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 66 — part 1 to paragraph 62

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 66 — part 1 to paragraph 62
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
122 for · 502 against · 47 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 121 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 62 – Am 66/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172804
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 122 for, 502 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU public spending goes to EU companies, and EU companies only;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 6Abst. 3No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
GreensFor 5Against 45Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
S&DFor 6Against 127Abst. 0No vote 3 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 2No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 5Against 171Abst. 1No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 4Against 64Abst. 4No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 49Against 21Abst. 11No vote 5 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
ESNFor 2Against 2Abst. 15No vote 7 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.68
No groupFor 17Against 1Abst. 10No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium220
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0200
Finland020
France0130
Greece030
Croatia030
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0200
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta300
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaAmendment139 for, 431 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 567 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15, adding text before paragraph 1 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment99 for, 510 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 641 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4, point 2, paragraph 4 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment173 for, 459 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 608 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 8 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment134 for, 447 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 586 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 14, adding text before paragraph 1 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment145 for, 499 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 653 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment119 for, 428 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ECR, The Leftr · shared0.77 547 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment84 for, 441 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 536 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment154 for, 513 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 627 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment131 for, 492 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 596 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital A EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment111 for, 440 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 533 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172804
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 66 — part 1 to paragraph 62 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172804, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172804 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172804,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 66 — part 1 to paragraph 62 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172804}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172804},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172804, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}