Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 67, after paragraph 61

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 67, after paragraph 61
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
64 for · 514 against · 93 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 120 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 61 – Am 67
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172802
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 64 for, 514 against, 93 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 10 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 2Abst. 8No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
GreensFor 7Against 40Abst. 2No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
S&DFor 12Against 116Abst. 3No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 1Against 70Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 5Against 171Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 1No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 2Against 33Abst. 47No vote 4 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 1Against 6Abst. 15No vote 4 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.52
No groupFor 4Against 5Abst. 17No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium003
Czechia180
Denmark001
Spain060
France1028
Greece001
Hungary0010
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands051
Poland002
Portugal011

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172802
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 67, after paragraph 61 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172802, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172802 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172802,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 67, after paragraph 61 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172802}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172802},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172802, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}