Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 65, after paragraph 58

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 65, after paragraph 58
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
62 for · 588 against · 29 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:06
More facts (6)
Position
vote 114 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 58 – Am 65
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172795
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 62 for, 588 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 9 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 7No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 3Against 42Abst. 6No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
S&DFor 1Against 128Abst. 3No vote 4 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 176Abst. 0No vote 10 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 9 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 1Against 74Abst. 7No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 2Against 20Abst. 1No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 17Against 6Abst. 5No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
France030
Greece010
Croatia010
Italy0220
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0200
Romania050
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 679 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172795
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 65, after paragraph 58 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172795, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172795 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172795,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 65, after paragraph 58 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172795}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172795},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172795, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}