Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 98, after paragraph 55

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 98, after paragraph 55
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
92 for · 541 against · 40 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:04
More facts (6)
Position
vote 102 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 55 – Am 98
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172782
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 92 for, 541 against, 40 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 14 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 7No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 131Abst. 0No vote 4 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 5Against 171Abst. 1No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 7Against 66Abst. 0No vote 7 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 49Against 8Abst. 25No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 12Abst. 7No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1200
France100
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 673 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 137 to paragraph 18 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment115 for, 531 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 628 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 10 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment79 for, 541 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 619 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 59 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment130 for, 473 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 591 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 7, adding text after recital M 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAmendment114 for, 547 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 638 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 13 to recital C 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment133 for, 536 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 646 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaAmendment110 for, 525 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 616 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 26 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAmendment114 for, 543 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 645 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 6 to recital Y The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment122 for, 432 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 520 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 6 to recital A 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAmendment103 for, 561 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 639 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 3 to recital A 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment108 for, 514 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 610 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172782
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 98, after paragraph 55 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172782, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172782 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172782,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 98, after paragraph 55 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172782}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172782},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172782, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}