Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 103 — part 1 to paragraph 46

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 103 — part 1 to paragraph 46
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
478 for · 102 against · 94 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 88 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 46 – Am 103/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172766
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 478 for, 102 against, 94 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls for a more geographically balanced development of the EDTIB,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 12Abst. 25No vote 3 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 2No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 5No vote 4 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 5Against 66Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 170Against 6Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 8No vote 8 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 38Against 5Abst. 40No vote 3 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 3No vote 3 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 4Against 12Abst. 11No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Cyprus001
Germany112
Denmark100
Spain022
Finland300
France008
Greece004
Ireland003
Italy080
Netherlands100
Portugal011
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 674 members

No vote recorded, 45

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 45 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 132, adding text after paragraph 44 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment463 for, 169 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 629 voters
6 May 2025Separate vote on recital F Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2024/003 BE/Van Hool – BelgiumSeparate vote478 for, 149 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.64 618 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment529 for, 105 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.60 597 voters
Show 6 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment504 for, 94 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.58 591 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 Public procurementAmendment530 for, 78 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.54 607 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment512 for, 84 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.53 628 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 56 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote481 for, 112 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.52 626 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 19 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment480 for, 105 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.51 593 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 1 Situation in VenezuelaSeparate vote318 for, 258 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.50 567 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172766
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 103 — part 1 to paragraph 46 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172766, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172766 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172766,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 103 — part 1 to paragraph 46 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172766}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172766},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172766, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}