Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 44 — part 2

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Paragraph 44 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
513 for · 122 against · 32 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 86 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 44/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172763
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 513 for, 122 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 30Abst. 11No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
GreensFor 43Against 3Abst. 5No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
S&DFor 125Against 5Abst. 0No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 66Against 4Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 172Against 0Abst. 1No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 66Against 4Abst. 0No vote 10 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 36Against 41Abst. 4No vote 5 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 4No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 2Against 17Abst. 7No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria002
Cyprus010
Czechia020
Germany180
Spain001
Greece130
Poland001
Romania001
Slovakia032

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 3 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote408 for, 96 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 498 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote538 for, 75 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.82 609 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 2 Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential electionsSplit vote450 for, 153 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 573 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Military MobilityFinal493 for, 127 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.82 608 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote532 for, 85 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.81 614 voters
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSplit vote487 for, 113 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by EPP, ESNr · shared0.81 603 voters
13 Feb 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaSplit vote390 for, 98 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 525 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaSplit vote491 for, 122 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 610 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 2 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote447 for, 126 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 556 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)Final457 for, 148 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.80 594 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172763
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 44 — part 2 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172763, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172763 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172763,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 44 — part 2 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172763}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172763},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172763, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}