Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 101 to paragraph 39

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 101 to paragraph 39
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
159 for · 442 against · 73 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:01
More facts (6)
Position
vote 84 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 39 – Am 101
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172760
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 159 for, 442 against, 73 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 20Abst. 18No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
GreensFor 1Against 50Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 2Against 126Abst. 4No vote 4 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 4Against 66Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 7Against 169Abst. 1No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 69Against 2Abst. 1No vote 8 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 67Against 1Abst. 14No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 2Against 2Abst. 18No vote 4 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 2Against 6Abst. 17No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Cyprus001
Germany013
Denmark010
Spain022
Finland300
France008
Greece040
Ireland210
Italy080
Netherlands010
Portugal002
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 674 members

No vote recorded, 45

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 45 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2025Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther132 for, 334 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.88 444 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment195 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 619 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment171 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.86 610 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 32 to paragraph 81 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment201 for, 452 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 618 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.86 611 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 620 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.86 621 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 581 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment157 for, 428 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 584 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172760
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 101 to paragraph 39 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172760, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172760 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172760,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 101 to paragraph 39 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172760}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172760},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172760, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}