Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10 to paragraph 32

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 10 to paragraph 32
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
219 for · 445 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 73 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 32 – Am 10
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172747
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 219 for, 445 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 38Abst. 2No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
GreensFor 47Against 3Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 122Against 8Abst. 3No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 37Against 32Abst. 1No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
EPPFor 6Against 168Abst. 2No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 1Against 72Abst. 0No vote 7 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 1Against 80Abst. 1No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 2No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 1Against 23Abst. 4No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus001
Czechia020
Germany172
Spain010
Greece040
Poland001
Romania010
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 679 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 553 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 23 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment229 for, 400 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 614 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 115 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment238 for, 395 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.79 608 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 22 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment246 for, 383 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 614 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Access to finance for SMEs and scale-upsAmendment264 for, 363 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 625 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 118 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment254 for, 381 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 608 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 583 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 270 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment190 for, 442 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 611 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.76 612 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 53 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment272 for, 357 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.76 601 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172747
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 10 to paragraph 32 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172747, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172747 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172747,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10 to paragraph 32 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172747}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172747},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172747, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}