Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 7

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
206 for · 447 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 32 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 7 – Am 8
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172697
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 206 for, 447 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 36Abst. 5No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 5Against 129Abst. 0No vote 2 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 1No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 13Against 156Abst. 3No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 69Against 1Abst. 3No vote 7 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 13Against 7Abst. 8No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark100
Spain030
Finland012
France080
Greece031
Ireland030
Italy090
Netherlands100
Portugal020
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 673 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.94 429 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.93 610 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.93 409 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 593 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 552 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 3 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment208 for, 460 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 632 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment209 for, 462 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 638 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment192 for, 443 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECR, Greens, S&Dr · shared0.91 609 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51 to paragraph 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 460 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 624 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172697
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 7 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172697, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172697 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172697,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 7 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172697}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172697},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172697, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}