Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 83, after paragraph 3

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 83, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
407 for · 212 against · 60 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 3 – Am 83
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172680
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 407 for, 212 against, 60 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 11Against 25Abst. 8No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 4Abst. 1No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 38Against 25Abst. 5No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
EPPFor 172Against 3Abst. 2No vote 11 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 2Against 62Abst. 9No vote 7 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 1Against 72Abst. 8No vote 5 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 0Against 4Abst. 20No vote 2 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 4Against 17Abst. 7No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria003
Czechia010
Germany0111
France010
Hungary001
Lithuania001
Poland003
Slovakia011

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 679 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySeparate vote409 for, 227 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by The Left, ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.82 606 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 48 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote415 for, 251 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 641 voters
20 Jan 2026Recital B — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 625 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 611 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote443 for, 171 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 614 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 544 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 548 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Banking Union – annual report 2025Final376 for, 187 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.78 542 voters
20 Jan 2026Recital F — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.78 614 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.78 541 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172680
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 83, after paragraph 3 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172680, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172680 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172680,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 83, after paragraph 3 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172680}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172680},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172680, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}