Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 to recital K

The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria

Vote
Amendment 22 to recital K
Result
219 for · 440 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 49 of 63 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC–B10–0157/2025 – recital K – Am 22
Vote id
172580
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 219 for, 440 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 1No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 1Against 50Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 27Against 144Abst. 2No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 2No vote 7 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 3No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France300
Greece100
Croatia100
Italy2200
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia300
Netherlands100
Poland2000
Romania500
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 573 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment217 for, 428 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.95 608 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital C Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment197 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 538 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 419 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 579 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 577 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital B Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment200 for, 382 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 540 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 142, adding text after paragraph 55 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment214 for, 436 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.95 606 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 45 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment198 for, 445 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 614 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 568 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 22 to recital K — The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172580, reference 2025/2569(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172580 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172580,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 to recital K — The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172580}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172580},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172580, reference 2025/2569(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}