Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 23 — part 2

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025

Vote
Paragraph 23 — part 2
Result
299 for · 347 against · 34 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:19
More facts (6)
Position
vote 36 of 83 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots · split vote: ECR, EPP, Patriots
Official label
A10–0023/2025 – Maravillas Abadía Jover – § 23/2
Vote id
172257
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 299 for, 347 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “stresses that an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income and active inclusion, in compliance with the subsidiarity principle, would contribute to the goals of reducing poverty and fostering the integration of people absent from the labour market;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 127Against 4Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 46Against 20Abst. 5No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
EPPFor 14Against 156Abst. 7No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 0No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 5No vote 3 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 1Against 10Abst. 13No vote 2 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
No groupFor 20Against 6Abst. 2No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria021
Czechia100
Germany0111
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 680 members

No vote recorded, 39

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 39 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 14 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Separate vote258 for, 321 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 567 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.89 617 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote245 for, 332 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.88 543 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 552 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 560 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 542 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 584 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 27 — part 3 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote279 for, 368 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.87 613 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 541 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 23 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172257, reference 2024/2084(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172257 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172257,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 23 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172257}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172257},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172257, reference 2024/2084(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}