Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2025
Result
110 for · 309 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2025, 17:20
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group
Vote id
172159
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 26Abst. 6No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 90Abst. 0No vote 46 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 34 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 108Abst. 2No vote 77 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 33Against 0Abst. 1No vote 46 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 36 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 13Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 2Abst. 0No vote 14 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Germany610
Greece010
Romania100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 428 members

No vote recorded, 291

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 291 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment189 for, 436 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 386 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.98 423 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 8 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment169 for, 423 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 363 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 38 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 458 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.98 395 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.97 370 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 24 to recital N The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment182 for, 455 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 406 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment195 for, 429 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 389 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.97 323 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.97 372 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 81 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment190 for, 443 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 388 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-10/172159
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group”. Vote, 10 March 2025. votingId 172159. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-10/172159 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-10-172159,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-10/172159}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-10/172159},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172159. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}