Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 5

Genetically modified maize MON 95275

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 5
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2025
Result
209 for · 408 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2025, 12:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 6 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0060/2025 – After § 5 – Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0060
Dossier
2024/3011(RSP)
Vote id
171787
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 209 for, 408 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 29Abst. 7No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.62
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 2No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 1Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 2Against 63Abst. 1No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 35Against 128Abst. 5No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
ECRFor 60Against 9Abst. 3No vote 8 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 70Against 1Abst. 11No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 18Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 3No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Czechia701
Denmark010
Spain600
France2900
Greece100
Hungary0010
Italy800
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 2 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment200 for, 353 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 519 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment195 for, 354 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 519 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 83 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment162 for, 367 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 510 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 354 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 517 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital S Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment217 for, 409 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 592 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 78 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment211 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 520 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 43 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment228 for, 429 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 607 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 38 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment210 for, 357 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.88 518 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 78 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment175 for, 366 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 520 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.87 595 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-12/171787
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 5 — Genetically modified maize MON 95275”. Vote, 12 February 2025. votingId 171787, reference 2024/3011(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-12/171787 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-02-12-171787,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 5 — Genetically modified maize MON 95275}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-12/171787}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-12/171787},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171787, reference 2024/3011(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}