Skip to content

Decision · Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified maize MON 95275

Effect
Objection passed
Result
467 for · 156 against · 18 abstained roll call
Date
12 February 2025, 12:10–12:11
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the objection
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheriesHealth Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
6 votes · 5 roll calls · 4 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
171790
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 467 for, 156 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Objection passed by a large majority.

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (1 adopted, 3 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by Renew and EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 2No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 118Against 2Abst. 1No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 29Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
EPPFor 57Against 96Abst. 11No vote 24 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ECRFor 55Against 13Abst. 1No vote 11 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 75Against 7Abst. 0No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 19Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 24Against 1Abst. 3No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 26

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria161030.91
Belgium117040.42
Bulgaria92330.46
Cyprus4200—
Czechia117120.37
Germany50283150.43
Denmark75030.38
Estonia0700—
Spain2725080.28
Finland77010.25
France721080.98
Greece180031.00
Croatia111000.88
Hungary180031.00
Ireland49010.54
Italy616090.87
Lithuania63200.32
Luxembourg2130—
Latvia7101—
Malta3201—
Netherlands2110000.52
Poland401570.80
Portugal119010.33
Romania1910130.45
Sweden1011000.29
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia140011.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Sophie WILMÈS BelgiumRenewSpeeches112 Feb 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 6

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 B10-0060/2025 – After § 4 – Am 3 Roll call256 for, 321 against, 70 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
2Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 B10-0060/2025 – After § 5 – Am 5 Roll call209 for, 408 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
3Vote on text inserted after citation 8 Show of hands Rejected
Show the other 5 votesShow the other 3 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 B10-0060/2025 – After § 5 – Am 5 Roll call209 for, 408 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
3Vote on text inserted after citation 8 Show of hands Rejected
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 4, adding text after recital J B10-0060/2025 – After recital J – Am 4 Roll call209 for, 407 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
5Amendment 2, adding text after recital M B10-0060/2025 – After recital M – Am 2 Roll call293 for, 250 against, 107 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
6Final vote — text as a whole B10-0060/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call467 for, 156 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, The Left

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2025-0060

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objected to a Commission draft decision that would have authorised the sale of products made from genetically modified maize MON 95275.

The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the maize cannot be authorised as proposed.

Parliament asks the Commission to withdraw its draft and submit a new one, and to consider risks to biodiversity, food safety and health.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution objects to the Commission's draft decision authorising genetically modified maize MON 95275. It calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft and not authorise the maize due to risks to biodiversity, food safety and workers' health.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/3011(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize MON 95275 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Parliament adopted the text on 12 February 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 12 February 2025 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ENVI · Authors: Biljana BORZAN (S&D), Martin HÄUSLING (Greens), Anja HAZEKAMP (The Left)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 6 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Genetically modified maize MON 95275”. Decision, 12 February 2025. votingId 171790, document B-10-2025-0060, reference 2024/3011(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-02-12/4 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-02-12/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-02-12-4,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Genetically modified maize MON 95275}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-02-12/4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-02-12/4},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 171790, document B-10-2025-0060, reference 2024/3011(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}